CAG Products - We think that these will help you to make your claim or Reclaim your Right
These sales help to ensure this site will remain free to use!

Small Claims Kit Small Claims Court Guide
**New Edition**
CAG envelope labels Last Will & Testament Kit Fight a Motoring Ticket

Get a CAG email address

Patricia Pearl - Small Claims Procedure - A Practical Guide
An excellent guide for the layperson in how to use the County Court - a must if you are intending to start a claim.
£19.99 + £1.50 (P&P)

Lawpack - Small Claims Kit
Contains everything you need to sue your bank (or anyone else) including sample forms, instruction manual, templates, and an entire set of court forms in PDF format on CD Rom.
£10.99 + £1.50 (P&P)

Last Will and Testament Kit
Make a legally valid will without the fuss and expense of a solicitor - includes a full step-by-step guide.
£9.99 + £1.50 (P&P)

Fight a Motoring Ticket Kit
All the templates and documents that you need to challenge your speeding ticket, parking fine - with advice from one of the UK's leading motor offence solicitors
£9.99 + £1.50 (P&P)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2
1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 32
  1. #1
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar

    GARY68 Informative GARY68 Informative GARY68 Informative

    Cagger since Jul 2006
    Posts 497

    Default gary68 v TSB PPI

    Hi All
    Ive been waiting for loyds to send my SARautolinker.com autolinking image for a month now and im about to send a "non conformance" letter off,
    the reason I wanted this amongst other charges were the PPIautolinker.com autolinking image I had paid on a loan I had back in 2001 for £5000 with £915 upfront ppi, this was taken out to refinance a existing overdraftautolinker.com autolinking image and pay off a loan which didnt have ppi on it,
    Today strangely enough I have recieved a single page letter as a statement from the loan as a statement, I say strange because I have requested this in my SARautolinker.com autolinking image and didnt think it would come separetly anyone else had this?
    Im chomping at the bit with this and want to sent it off but it doesnt include my ppi payments just a monthy loan payment although it does state that I have ppi at £915 upfront and has stated that the interest rate is 13.92% throughout the period
    I have my letter but could do with help working this out, using the correct calculator
    HALIFAX SETTLED IN FULL 31/10/06
    Lioyds TSB SETTLED IN FULL 04.07
    GARY68 V CAP ONE PPI+CHARGES-settled 90% out of court
    GARY68 V HALIFAX GOLD **WON**

    GARY68 V halifax platt **WON**
    +DEFAULT
    GARY68 V HALIFAX LOAN PPI **WON**

    GARY68 V HALIFAX BK CHARGES-
    ON HOLD 2 ACC'S
    Section 78 Write Off **won**

    the wife v halifax-journey **WON**
    GARY68 V TSB-BANK CHARGES £1300 ON HOLD COURT
    Gary68-tsb-ppi.html
    PENDING CLAIM PPI





  2. # ADS
    Site Team

    Cagger since
    Feb
    Posts
    2007


    You can use Google to search the web using these links below:-



  3. #2
    Gold Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar

    pompeyfaith Authoritative pompeyfaith Authoritative pompeyfaith Authoritative pompeyfaith Authoritative pompeyfaith Authoritative pompeyfaith Authoritative pompeyfaith Authoritative pompeyfaith Authoritative pompeyfaith Authoritative pompeyfaith Authoritative pompeyfaith Authoritative

    Cagger since Jan 2007
    I am in Where the ball did not cross the line
    Posts 5,571

    Default Re: gary68 v TSB PPI

    Hiya Gary,

    You have a PM

    Regards

    PF

  4. #3
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar

    GARY68 Informative GARY68 Informative GARY68 Informative

    Cagger since Jul 2006
    Posts 497

    Default Re: gary68 v TSB PPI

    WEHEY
    Hi Pf many thanks for quick response

  5. #4
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar

    GARY68 Informative GARY68 Informative GARY68 Informative

    Cagger since Jul 2006
    Posts 497

    Default Re: gary68 v TSB PPI

    Bit reluctant to post up but here is a breif detail
    loan over 4years to pay off existing loan+overdraftautolinker.com autolinking image march 2001 payed off 2003 (2 years early and recieved £29.27 in refund)
    borrowed £5000
    PPIautolinker.com autolinking image 915.99
    13.92%

  6. #5
    Gold Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar

    pompeyfaith Authoritative pompeyfaith Authoritative pompeyfaith Authoritative pompeyfaith Authoritative pompeyfaith Authoritative pompeyfaith Authoritative pompeyfaith Authoritative pompeyfaith Authoritative pompeyfaith Authoritative pompeyfaith Authoritative pompeyfaith Authoritative

    Cagger since Jan 2007
    I am in Where the ball did not cross the line
    Posts 5,571

    Default Re: gary68 v TSB PPI

    Is ok gary i have everything needed to work this out for you.

    It is getting late now so this will be my first to do tomorrow evening ok.

    There is a reply in your inbox.

    Regards

    Leon

  7. #6
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar

    GARY68 Informative GARY68 Informative GARY68 Informative

    Cagger since Jul 2006
    Posts 497

    Default Re: gary68 v TSB PPI

    Thanks PF
    your a star,
    this is my letter proposal






    Dear Sir/Madam,
    Re: Personal Loan reference
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxx


    I purchased the above PPIautolinker.com autolinking image policy from you on 13/03/2001 in connection with the Loan agreement referenced above.

    This was after a appointment with a TSB employee xxxxxxxxx after he reduced my overdraftautolinker.com autolinking image facility and was talked into refinancing my current loan, this was putting me under financial stress and I was persuaded to commit to a new loan.

    I believe that I was mis-sold this policy for the reasons given below, and wish you to investigate my complaint according to your normal complaint procedures.

    I was not told that the insurance was optional and that I could purchase this else where I was led to believe that my application for credit would be rejected if I did not take out the insurance.

    It was not explained to me that the policy premium would be paid upfront as a single premium and would be added to my debt and attract interest from the outset.

    The insurance would have expired before my loan agreement ended which means we would have been paying interest on a policy which is no longer in force. This was not made clear to me at the time the policy was sold to me.


    Furthermore there would have been a period of 24 months in which I would not have been covered at all.

    I now believe also that there were commission built in on selling PPI policys after researching
    .
    I expect my complaint to be upheld and require a refund of all premiums paid to the policy, plus any additional interest charged to the account because of the PPI. I would also like to claim statutory interest compensation in view of the fact that I have been deprived of the cash over that period.

    The original premium was £915.99 debited to my Loan account on 13th March 2001. You refunded £29.27 on 6th March 2003 this being interest as the Loan was settled 24 months early.


    I require the £915.99 policy premium charge refunded plus the interest paid to you over the term of £xxxxxxxx

    As I have been denied this money over a considerable period of time I also require interest on this amount at 8% simple this being the statutory judicial rate.


    Therefore I also require £xxxxxxx being 8% simple

    The total claim is therefore £xxxxxxxx.


    I have calculated the above at 13.92% APR.save where as I’ve added statutory interest which was your APR at the time of us taking out the Loan and reflecting the principal of mutuality and reciprocity. I am sure you will advise me if the APR at the time was different. Alternatively I will ask the Court to allow me statutory interest at 8% under S69 of the Count Court Act as I have been deprived of this money.
    .
    I trust you can resolve this complaint in the 8 weeks you are obliged to allow as I’m sure you do not want me to escalate this complaint further to the Financial Ombudsmanautolinker.com autolinking image Service and/or the Civil Courts.



    Yours faithfully

    Gary68



    any thoughts on the above,

    AA if your looking in do you have the address for ppi claims or is it andover?

  8. #7
    Site Team
    alanalana Authoritative alanalana Authoritative alanalana Authoritative alanalana Authoritative alanalana Authoritative alanalana Authoritative alanalana Authoritative alanalana Authoritative alanalana Authoritative alanalana Authoritative alanalana Authoritative alanalana's Avatar

    Cagger since Nov 2006
    I am in Cumbria
    Posts 4,631

    Default Re: gary68 v TSB PPI

    Full address:

    Lloydsautolinker.com autolinking image TSB Bank Plc
    DSAR Team
    Customer Service
    Recovery Centre
    Charlton Place C57
    Andover
    Hampshire
    SP10 1RE
    I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.
    ------------------------------------------------
    Bank charge successes:
    Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.
    HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.
    RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.
    2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did
    PPI Successes
    PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.
    2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.
    2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

    PPI Claims ongoing with:
    Cap one Now with the FOS
    Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.
    LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

    1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..
    Post 290 from
    ***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

    Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

    Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

  9. #8
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar

    GARY68 Informative GARY68 Informative GARY68 Informative

    Cagger since Jul 2006
    Posts 497

    Default Re: gary68 v TSB PPI

    CHEERS AA
    But is that not for SARautolinker.com autolinking image's this is for PPIautolinker.com autolinking image,
    may be I should address it to complaints or just customer service and leave

  10. #9
    Site Team
    alanalana Authoritative alanalana Authoritative alanalana Authoritative alanalana Authoritative alanalana Authoritative alanalana Authoritative alanalana Authoritative alanalana Authoritative alanalana Authoritative alanalana Authoritative alanalana Authoritative alanalana's Avatar

    Cagger since Nov 2006
    I am in Cumbria
    Posts 4,631

    Default Re: gary68 v TSB PPI

    The fact it is customer service recovery centre may do the trick. I sent a SARautolinker.com autolinking image to London and it was sent of the the DSAR team at Andover.

    They have so many addresses and it all goes into slowing down the process.

    I will see if I can turn anything more up later.
    I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.
    ------------------------------------------------
    Bank charge successes:
    Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.
    HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.
    RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.
    2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did
    PPI Successes
    PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.
    2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.
    2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

    PPI Claims ongoing with:
    Cap one Now with the FOS
    Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.
    LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

    1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..
    Post 290 from
    ***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

    Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

    Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

  11. #10
    Gold Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar

    pompeyfaith Authoritative pompeyfaith Authoritative pompeyfaith Authoritative pompeyfaith Authoritative pompeyfaith Authoritative pompeyfaith Authoritative pompeyfaith Authoritative pompeyfaith Authoritative pompeyfaith Authoritative pompeyfaith Authoritative pompeyfaith Authoritative

    Cagger since Jan 2007
    I am in Where the ball did not cross the line
    Posts 5,571

    Default Re: gary68 v TSB PPI

    Right,

    Working this out they have done you like a kipper, firstly that £29.27 was not a rebate but a refund because you paid to much.

    The Balance of the Loan was £3488.54 but you paid £3517.81.

    Secondly as this Loan only ran for 24 months and not the contracted 48 months you should of had a settlement of the PPIautolinker.com autolinking image paid back into the Loan to reduce the balance but you did not.

    You have paid the PPI for the full 48 month term.

    I will now get on and finish the work sheet.

    Regards

    PF

  12. #11
    Site Team
    alanalana Authoritative alanalana Authoritative alanalana Authoritative alanalana Authoritative alanalana Authoritative alanalana Authoritative alanalana Authoritative alanalana Authoritative alanalana Authoritative alanalana Authoritative alanalana Authoritative alanalana's Avatar

    Cagger since Nov 2006
    I am in Cumbria
    Posts 4,631

    Default Re: gary68 v TSB PPI

    Quote Originally Posted by pompeyfaith View Post
    Right,

    Working this out they have done you like a kipper, firstly that £29.27 was not a rebate but a refund because you paid to much.

    The Balance of the Loan was £3488.54 but you paid £3517.81.

    Secondly as this Loan only ran for 24 months and not the contracted 48 months you should of had a settlement of the PPIautolinker.com autolinking image paid back into the Loan to reduce the balance but you did not.

    You have paid the PPI for the full 48 month term.

    I will now get on and finish the work sheet.

    Regards

    PF
    You could have probably got me three times what I settled for

    aa
    I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.
    ------------------------------------------------
    Bank charge successes:
    Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.
    HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.
    RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.
    2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did
    PPI Successes
    PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.
    2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.
    2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

    PPI Claims ongoing with:
    Cap one Now with the FOS
    Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.
    LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

    1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..
    Post 290 from
    ***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

    Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

    Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

  13. #12
    Gold Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar

    pompeyfaith Authoritative pompeyfaith Authoritative pompeyfaith Authoritative pompeyfaith Authoritative pompeyfaith Authoritative pompeyfaith Authoritative pompeyfaith Authoritative pompeyfaith Authoritative pompeyfaith Authoritative pompeyfaith Authoritative pompeyfaith Authoritative

    Cagger since Jan 2007
    I am in Where the ball did not cross the line
    Posts 5,571

    Default Re: gary68 v TSB PPI

    Hiya Alan,

    I hope you are well, and yup maybe but on a side note i love doing the maths side of claims as due to the stroke i had it keeps my brain working luckily my stroke did not affect that part of my brain.

    Regards

    PF

  14. #13
    Site Team
    alanalana Authoritative alanalana Authoritative alanalana Authoritative alanalana Authoritative alanalana Authoritative alanalana Authoritative alanalana Authoritative alanalana Authoritative alanalana Authoritative alanalana Authoritative alanalana Authoritative alanalana's Avatar

    Cagger since Nov 2006
    I am in Cumbria
    Posts 4,631

    Default Re: gary68 v TSB PPI

    Quote Originally Posted by pompeyfaith View Post
    Hiya Alan,

    I hope you are well, and yup maybe but on a side note i love doing the maths side of claims as due to the stroke i had it keeps my brain working luckily my stroke did not affect that part of my brain.

    Regards

    PF
    Way to go mate.
    I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.
    ------------------------------------------------
    Bank charge successes:
    Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.
    HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.
    RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.
    2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did
    PPI Successes
    PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.
    2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.
    2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

    PPI Claims ongoing with:
    Cap one Now with the FOS
    Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.
    LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

    1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..
    Post 290 from
    ***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

    Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

    Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

  15. #14
    Gold Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar

    pompeyfaith Authoritative pompeyfaith Authoritative pompeyfaith Authoritative pompeyfaith Authoritative pompeyfaith Authoritative pompeyfaith Authoritative pompeyfaith Authoritative pompeyfaith Authoritative pompeyfaith Authoritative pompeyfaith Authoritative pompeyfaith Authoritative

    Cagger since Jan 2007
    I am in Where the ball did not cross the line
    Posts 5,571

    Default Re: gary68 v TSB PPI

    Anyway thats another one done NEXT

    PF

  16. #15
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar

    GARY68 Informative GARY68 Informative GARY68 Informative

    Cagger since Jul 2006
    Posts 497

    Default Re: gary68 v TSB PPI

    sorry for not replying earlier PF,
    many thanks for your much appreciated work once again,

    Ive just been going through your figures and the £29, has now made me even more mad, I thought it was a rebate but as you pointed out it was a overpaymentautolinker.com autolinking image , what a rip off, but no surprise really.
    looking at your figures it would be well worth claiming the contractual but I dont know if they will be more inclined to pay out on the statuary interestautolinker.com autolinking image-if any- as there is nearly a 2 grand difference,
    whats your veiws on this guys and do you think I would have any success at all with the Lloydsautolinker.com autolinking image as this loan was finished in 2003 I wonder if they would consider it to late to claim,
    Im going for the claim anyway just wanted to know which you would think would be a more clear cut claim,

  17. #16
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar

    GARY68 Informative GARY68 Informative GARY68 Informative

    Cagger since Jul 2006
    Posts 497

    Default Re: gary68 v TSB PPI


    ok amended now this is for statutory int
    this is my letter proposal


    Dear Sir/Madam,
    Re: Personal Loan reference
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxx


    I purchased the above PPIautolinker.com autolinking image policy from you on 13/03/2001 in connection with the Loan agreement referenced above.

    This was after a appointment with a TSB employee xxxxxxxxx after he reduced my overdraftautolinker.com autolinking image facility and was talked into refinancing my current loan, this was putting me under financial stress and I was persuaded to commit to a new loan.

    I believe that I was mis-sold this policy for the reasons given below, and wish you to investigate my complaint according to your normal complaint procedures.

    I was not told that the insurance was optional and that I could purchase this else where I was led to believe that my application for credit would be rejected if I did not take out the insurance.

    It was not explained to me that the policy premium would be paid upfront as a single premium and would be added to my debt and attract interest from the outset.

    The insurance would have expired before my loan agreement ended which means we would have been paying interest on a policy which is no longer in force. This was not made clear to me at the time the policy was sold to me.


    Furthermore there would have been a period of 24 months in which I would not have been covered at all.

    I now believe also that there were commission built in on selling PPI policys after researching


    I expect my complaint to be upheld and require a refund of all premiums paid to the policy, plus any additional interest charged to the account because of the PPI. I would also like to claim statutory interest compensation in view of the fact that I have been deprived of the cash over that period.

    The original premium was £915.99 debited to my Loan account on 13th March 2001. You refunded £29.27 on 6th March 2003 this being a overpaymentautolinker.com autolinking image on the policy interest as the Loan was settled 24 months early.


    I require the £915.99 policy premium charge refunded plus the interest paid to you over the term of £229.64

    As I have been denied this money over a considerable period of time I also require interest on this amount at 8% simple this being the statutory judicial rate.


    Therefore I also require £741.11 being 8% simple

    The total claim is therefore £1,886.64


    I have calculated the above at 13.92% APR.save where as I’ve added statutory interest which was your APR at the time of us taking out the Loan and reflecting the principal of mutuality and reciprocity. I am sure you will advise me if the APR at the time was different. Alternatively I will ask the Court to allow me statutory interest at 8% under S69 of the Count Court Act as I have been deprived of this money.
    .
    I trust you can resolve this complaint in the 8 weeks you are obliged to allow as I’m sure you do not want me to escalate this complaint further to the Financial Ombudsmanautolinker.com autolinking image Service and/or the Civil Courts.



    Yours faithfully

    Gary68

    any extra bits would be appreciated guys

  18. #17
    Classic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Make a contribution

    landy_alert Highly informative landy_alert Highly informative landy_alert Highly informative landy_alert Highly informative landy_alert Highly informative landy_alert Highly informative landy_alert Highly informative landy_alert's Avatar

    Cagger since Nov 2008
    I am in side a pile of LTSB 'fob-off' letters struggling to get out!
    Posts 2,309

    Default Re: gary68 v TSB PPI

    Quote Originally Posted by GARY68 View Post
    sorry for not replying earlier PF,
    many thanks for your much appreciated work once again,

    Ive just been going through your figures and the £29, has now made me even more mad, I thought it was a rebate but as you pointed out it was a overpaymentautolinker.com autolinking image , what a rip off, but no surprise really.
    looking at your figures it would be well worth claiming the contractual but I dont know if they will be more inclined to pay out on the statuary interestautolinker.com autolinking image-if any- as there is nearly a 2 grand difference,
    whats your veiws on this guys and do you think I would have any success at all with the Lloydsautolinker.com autolinking image as this loan was finished in 2003 I wonder if they would consider it to late to claim,
    Im going for the claim anyway just wanted to know which you would think would be a more clear cut claim,
    Hi Gary

    We are currently in the process of claiming back PPIautolinker.com autolinking image on 6 loans from LTSB (some current and some settled, the oldest having been settled in 2002) and I have to say LTSB are absolutely awful to deal with.

    I assumed that with all of the loans they would put a fight rather than just pay up, but they are proving very difficult indeed.

    On our oldest loans, they have returned the paperwork we sent them stating that the account numbers are not recognised, even though we sent them proof that these accounts did exist. We have the original CCAs so I think they are just trying to pull a fast one in implying that these loans are so old and that because they no longer have the original agreements, they don't have an obligation to refund us - which is a load of hogwash.

    On the slightly more recent loans, they have not even had the courtesy to acknowledge the letters we have sent!

    The current loans are still being investigated by them - so at least they are doing something.

    I'm not trying to put you off at all, but do be prepared for an uphill struggle - it's certainly worth it though, particularly as you'll get plenty of support and assistance from everyone here!

    We have asked initially for contractual interest, btw, because you can always accept less that way.

    Good luck,

    Landy x
    LTSB Current Account Charges - Prelim sent Feb 2009

    LTSB PPI on various loans (current/settled) - Refunded inc 8%

    MBNA 1 Charges - Refunded inc CI

    MBNA 1 PPI - Refunded

    MBNA 2 Charges - With FOS

    MBNA 2 PPI - Refunded

    Swift Advances (settled) Mortgage Charges - Prelim sent May 2009

    Swift Advances (settled) Mortgage PPI - With FOS

    Sainsburys (settled) Loan PPI - Refunded inc CI +8%

    Sainsburys (closed) Card Charges - Refunded inc CI + 8%

    M&S Money (closed) Card Charges - Refunded inc CI

    M&S Money (closed) Card PPI - Refunded inc 8%

    Direct Line (settled) Loan PPI - Refunded inc CI + 8%

    Debenhams Card (closed) PPI - Refunded inc 8%

    C&G (settled) Mortgage Charges - Refunded inc CI + 8%

    S.Widows (settled) Mortgage cover - With FOS

    Hitachi Finance (closed) Charges - With FOS

  19. #18
    Gold Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar

    pompeyfaith Authoritative pompeyfaith Authoritative pompeyfaith Authoritative pompeyfaith Authoritative pompeyfaith Authoritative pompeyfaith Authoritative pompeyfaith Authoritative pompeyfaith Authoritative pompeyfaith Authoritative pompeyfaith Authoritative pompeyfaith Authoritative

    Cagger since Jan 2007
    I am in Where the ball did not cross the line
    Posts 5,571

    Default Re: gary68 v TSB PPI

    Gary,

    You go for the contractual interestautolinker.com autolinking image rate at 13.92% as this is what you have paid on each payment.

    Then quiet rightly add on the 8% statutory judicial rate as they have Loaned that money from you.

    The 13.92% goes on for each payment where as the 8% is applied from 13/03/2001 until time of payment.

    If you would like me to work out exactly what you are due let me know and ill work it out.

    Because it is getting late now and i need my bed I cannot do this though until tomorrow evening.

    Regards

    PF

  20. #19
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar

    GARY68 Informative GARY68 Informative GARY68 Informative

    Cagger since Jul 2006
    Posts 497

    Default Re: gary68 v TSB PPI

    Hi Landy
    ive been looking at your threads recently,and I know that Lloydsautolinker.com autolinking image wont be bending over for this claim and I may have to go fosautolinker.com autolinking image or court route, I think I will be claiming for the contractual interestautolinker.com autolinking image, like you say I could except a lower offer later-if any-,
    Im going to amend and post off and see what happens and I think I will include this quote:

    Firstly, I understand that at the time I entered into the contract with you your bank was running an incentive scheme to encourage your employees to sell PPIautolinker.com autolinking image schemes, as were several other High Street banks. A former employee of yours has posted the following on a public website in September 2006:


    I worked for Lloyds TSB up to 4 1/2 years ago - the points system you state is being used by RBSautolinker.com autolinking image was used by Lloyds TSB more than 5 years ago.

    Bosses and Regional Managers turn a blind eye to 'mis-selling' because they get bigger cash bonuses (or foreign holidaysautolinker.com autolinking image) than the staff selling the products. Even worse, Lloyds TSB use the disciplinary procedure to threaten staff with dismissalautolinker.com autolinking image for failing to reach targets.

    I was personally threatened in this way and in the end left, after 25 years service, to find much more fulfilling employment elsewhere.

    Failing to hit targets was a bigger crime than mis-selling, which in my experience was brushed under the carpet.



    I was not aware of this and even if it is untrue, I consider that there was a clear conflict of interest between your fiduciary responsibilities to me and the direct selling by your employees of PPI schemes, given the very large profit margins they generate.

  21. #20
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar

    GARY68 Informative GARY68 Informative GARY68 Informative

    Cagger since Jul 2006
    Posts 497

    Default Re: gary68 v TSB PPI

    Quote Originally Posted by pompeyfaith View Post
    Gary,

    You go for the contractual interestautolinker.com autolinking image rate at 13.92% as this is what you have paid on each payment.

    Then quiet rightly add on the 8% statutory judicial rate as they have Loaned that money from you.

    The 13.92% goes on for each payment where as the 8% is applied from 13/03/2001 until time of payment.

    If you would like me to work out exactly what you are due let me know and ill work it out.

    Because it is getting late now and i need my bed I cannot do this though until tomorrow evening.

    Regards

    PF
    thanks PF
    I can work from your spread sheet on that I think

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2
1 2 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Browsealoud
Video Tour



Reclaim the Right Ltd. - reg.05783665 in the UK reg. office:- 923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE