Hi all,
I followed the process through intitially and then due to various reasons and lack of time i didnt get to filing with the court. So
RBS
kept my case on hold and have now wrote to me to say sorry mate but you lost.
They have stated that if i dont respond withing 8 weeks then they consider the matter closed. I have a few weeks left and want to put a letter together to say i dont accept that it is closed as the matter is still ongoing.
Because i didnt originally file under reg 6, does that mean i can go straight in with reg 5.
Also.... is there any argument against the charges... which they have admitted fund free banking, when you have a type of account that you are paying for. ie royalties gold account. Your charges ae being used to fund free banking yet you dont even use free banking.
The banks always stated that the charges coved the
admin
fees. Now they admit that they make a profit and justify it by saying it keps banking free. So if for many years like myself you have paid for a gold account, then a royalties gold account you are not using the service that they say you have been paying for.
So in my case... and many others we were made to accept the charges thinking that they were justified by costs. Now we are told effectively that they now are justified by the
admin
cost and to fund free banking. Yet i can show that i have been paying for my banking service for many years. In fact, the whole time i was accumalating the charges in my claim.
Any thoughts or direction on this would be appreciated.
Thanks
Sambuca