| | | CAG Announcements | |
Welcome Guest
Please register
Registration is free
There are no charges for using any of the facilities of this website.
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ.
You will have to register before you can post.
To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
You will also have to register to access our template letters and claims forms
registration is free
Are you being threatened over debts more than 6 years old? This may be unfair
See our new Unfair Trading Guide eBay buyer? Buy more cheaply
Win more often
ConsumerSniper.com Have you been defaulted?
Would you like to clean up your credit file? Check it out | Ebay buyer? ConsumerSniper Free unlimited bids and eBay tools Have you been defaulted?
Would you like to clean up your credit file? Check it out | | | | | | | | Notices | PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING Every pound donated to this site helps us to keep on helping others. Click Here to Donate | | Royal Bank of Scotland Meet other RBS customers who have also been faced with excessive unfair bank charges. Exchange encouragement and information about getting your bank charges refunded |
14th May 2009, 19:26
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Classic Account Holder | Lexis200 v Tesco Hello
I'm currently waiting on an Subject access request from Tesco, and will also CCA them soon just for clarity.
My issue at the moment is the DN I have.
It's from a while back, when I was setting up payments to them, and before I was aware of my rights, or the fact the notice might be wrong.
Anyway here's the default http://i508.photobucket.com/albums/s...scodefault.jpg
...and the subsequent termination http://i508.photobucket.com/albums/s...ermination.jpg
Would I be right in thinking they've been a bit silly with the remedy dates? If so, what's my next step?
Thanks
Lexis 
__________________ Time flies like an arrow... Fruit flies like a banana. |
| |
18th May 2009, 10:18
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Classic Account Holder | Re: Lexis200 v Tesco Thanks very much for this alangee - any idea how I should proceed?
I pretty much get the DN stuff when they have it wrong (although I still like confirmation I'm not missing something obvious!), but I don't quite know what to do with the information!
Any help from anyone would be much appreciated  |
| |
18th May 2009, 17:56
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Basic Account Holder
Where else can you earn 8% interest on your money? Start your County Court claim NOW!!! Cagger since
: Sep 2008 I am in: Hampshire nr Southampton
Posts: 304
| Re: Lexis200 v Tesco Keep the DN in a safe place. When they terminate (with a defective DN) you will only be liable for the arrears mentioned in the DN. If they issue court proceedings, then even if they have a kosher Credit Agreement, they will fall down on the Default Notice.
Alan |
| |
18th May 2009, 20:17
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Classic Account Holder | Re: Lexis200 v Tesco Hi Alan
They have actually terminated the agreement - not long after the remedy date of the DN.
I'm just wondering how to go about telling them they've fouled up, and then what do I do to try and get them to accept just the arrears?
Although I'm resigned to the fact I may end up in court, obviously I'd rather not, so any suggestions are very welcome  |
| |
19th May 2009, 17:38
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Site Team | Re: Lexis200 v Tesco Bliddy hell, I wish I had been given these
DN date 24 March - remedy date 7 April = not enough time for even 1st class mail especially as the 24th March was a Saturday
Then they Terminated 3 days after issuing the DN ie 27th March ??
Fantastic 
__________________ Please CLICK HERE and support the petition to stop unfair bank charges and return the charges retrospectively.
USEFUL LINKS: Beginner's guide Link to CAG template letters Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional. PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE |
| |
19th May 2009, 18:24
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Classic Account Holder | Re: Lexis200 v Tesco Yep, this one and Lloyds I'm pretty happy about
What I really want though is to use it to get the debt and my CRA file cleared, without going down the court route and asap.
I'm not asking much...  |
| |
20th May 2009, 13:23
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Basic Account Holder | Re: Lexis200 v Tesco Hi Lexis
I think your next step is to request a Subject access request and/or a copy of your CCA. If you go for the Subject Access Request, and you find there are unlawful charges, this could be another reason that the DN is defective. You should also get a copy of your agreement with the Subject Access Request and if that is defective, that should make the DN irrelevant. Collect as much information as you can.
Tesco will not accept that the DN is defective, so you will just be in a to and fro situation if you tell them. If it ever comes to court, the DJ should side with you, and you may be able to make a counter claim for unlawful charges.
If it were me, I would just sit back and collect as much information as I could, so that if it does go to court I am in a good position to contest it.
I have just reread your OP and see that you have already sent for a Subject Access Request/CCA.
Alan
Last edited by alangee; 20th May 2009 at 13:27.
Reason: correction
|
| |
21st May 2009, 08:56
|
#10 (permalink)
| | Classic Account Holder I am in: need of chocolate
Posts: 2,393
| Re: Lexis200 v Tesco Thanks Alan - very helpful info
My only issue is that I could do with not having this hanging over me for ages until they possibly decide to go to court... |
| |
16th June 2009, 18:11
|
#11 (permalink)
| | Classic Account Holder | Re: Lexis200 v Tesco After a stupid wait for the Subject access request it arrived - with only statements and a couple of letters I had written to them
Round 2 ding ding. |
| |
17th June 2009, 20:30
|
#15 (permalink)
| | Classic Account Holder | Re: Lexis200 v Tesco Hey Underdog
You'd really think it'd be simple wouldn't you
What irks me is that all the information needed to draft these documents correctly appears to be online. I reckon I could knock up a decent credit agreement followed by a watertight DN without too much of an issue, so why the hell can't they when they have the access to all the legal nonce that they do?
Bl**dy banks  |
| |
17th June 2009, 20:39
|
#18 (permalink)
| | Classic Account Holder
Is your bank avoiding its debts Data disclosure poll Cagger since
: May 2008 I am in: need of chocolate
Posts: 2,393
| Re: Lexis200 v Tesco Quote:
Originally Posted by underdog13 Mind you, that said, thank goodness they do make so many mistakes with their DNs  | Absolutely, I wouldn't want it to change  |
| |
Reclaim the Right Ltd. - reg.05783665 in the UK reg. office:- 923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE
|