on what basis have they accepted responsibility? Could you let us know a little bit more of the facts of the mis-selling?
I'm getting a little tired of hearing of the banks are either admitting PPI mis-selling or else the
fos
is finding against them and they are simply being obliged to repay the money
These kind of cases strike me as an ideal basis for claims for
restitutionary damages
. What this means is that the bank has taken your money unjustly. They have unjustly enrich themselves. While there have had your money they have invested it all lent it out at commercial rates. They have enjoyed profiting from your money for a considerable period of time. To completely remedy the unjust enrichment, they should be required to disclose the profits of they have made and to repay those few as well.
This is not surprising or new law. The principal has been around for some time.
Let us know more about this case and its circumstances. You may find that you can quite easily double your money or even better.