| | | CAG Announcements | |
Welcome Guest
Please register
Registration is free
There are no charges for using any of the facilities of this website.
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ.
You will have to register before you can post.
To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
You will also have to register to access our template letters and claims forms
registration is free
Are you being threatened over debts more than 6 years old? This may be unfair
See our new Unfair Trading Guide eBay buyer? Buy more cheaply
Win more often
ConsumerSniper.com Have you been defaulted?
Would you like to clean up your credit file? Check it out | Ebay buyer? ConsumerSniper Free unlimited bids and eBay tools Have you been defaulted?
Would you like to clean up your credit file? Check it out | | | | | | | | Notices | PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING Every pound donated to this site helps us to keep on helping others. Click Here to Donate | | Payment Protection Insurance (PPI) The misselling of Payment Protection Insurance is widespread, and believed to run into billions of pounds. This forum will help you to see if you have a valid claim for a refund, and guide you through the process. |
23rd June 2009, 22:05
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Basic Account Holder | gary68 v TSB PPI Hi All
Ive been waiting for loyds to send my Subject access request for a month now and im about to send a "non conformance" letter off,
the reason I wanted this amongst other charges were the ppi I had paid on a loan I had back in 2001 for £5000 with £915 upfront ppi, this was taken out to refinance a existing overdraft and pay off a loan which didnt have ppi on it,
Today strangely enough I have recieved a single page letter as a statement from the loan as a statement, I say strange because I have requested this in my Subject access request and didnt think it would come separetly anyone else had this?
Im chomping at the bit with this and want to sent it off but it doesnt include my ppi payments just a monthy loan payment although it does state that I have ppi at £915 upfront and has stated that the interest rate is 13.92% throughout the period
I have my letter but could do with help working this out, using the correct calculator |
| |
23rd June 2009, 22:17
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Gold Account Holder
Is your bank avoiding its debts Data disclosure poll Cagger since
: Jan 2007 I am in: The Sunny South.
Posts: 4,336
| Re: gary68 v TSB PPI Hiya Gary,
You have a PM
Regards
PF |
| |
23rd June 2009, 22:25
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Basic Account Holder | Re: gary68 v TSB PPI Bit reluctant to post up but here is a breif detail
loan over 4years to pay off existing loan+ overdraft march 2001 payed off 2003 (2 years early and recieved £29.27 in refund)
borrowed £5000
ppi 915.99
13.92% |
| |
24th June 2009, 14:42
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Basic Account Holder
Watch out, there are Claims Touts about! Cagger since
: Jul 2006
Posts: 478
| Re: gary68 v TSB PPI CHEERS AA
But is that not for Subject access request 's this is for ppi,
may be I should address it to complaints or just customer service and leave |
| |
24th June 2009, 14:46
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Site Team | Re: gary68 v TSB PPI The fact it is customer service recovery centre may do the trick. I sent a Subject access request to London and it was sent of the the DSAR team at Andover.
They have so many addresses and it all goes into slowing down the process.
I will see if I can turn anything more up later.
__________________ I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner. ------------------------------------------------ Bank charge successes: Halifax - Full settlement incl interest. HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim. RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.
2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did  PPI Successes PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both. 2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.
2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement
PPI Claims ongoing with:
Cap one Now with the FOS
Barclays. They have now been given a deadline before FOS action. No response so complaints now with ICO and FOS.
LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc 1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this.. Post 290 from ***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON*** Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond. Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI. |
| |
24th June 2009, 20:06
|
#11 (permalink)
| | Site Team | Re: gary68 v TSB PPI Quote:
Originally Posted by pompeyfaith Right,
Working this out they have done you like a kipper, firstly that £29.27 was not a rebate but a refund because you paid to much.
The Balance of the Loan was £3488.54 but you paid £3517.81.
Secondly as this Loan only ran for 24 months and not the contracted 48 months you should of had a settlement of the PPI paid back into the Loan to reduce the balance but you did not.
You have paid the PPI for the full 48 month term.
I will now get on and finish the work sheet.
Regards
PF | You could have probably got me three times what I settled for
aa
__________________ I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner. ------------------------------------------------ Bank charge successes: Halifax - Full settlement incl interest. HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim. RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.
2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did  PPI Successes PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both. 2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.
2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement
PPI Claims ongoing with:
Cap one Now with the FOS
Barclays. They have now been given a deadline before FOS action. No response so complaints now with ICO and FOS.
LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc 1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this.. Post 290 from ***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON*** Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond. Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI. |
| |
24th June 2009, 20:28
|
#13 (permalink)
| | Site Team I am in: Cumbria
Posts: 4,528
| Re: gary68 v TSB PPI Quote:
Originally Posted by pompeyfaith Hiya Alan,
I hope you are well, and yup maybe but on a side note i love doing the maths side of claims as due to the stroke i had it keeps my brain working luckily my stroke did not affect that part of my brain.
Regards
PF | Way to go mate. 
__________________ I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner. ------------------------------------------------ Bank charge successes: Halifax - Full settlement incl interest. HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim. RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.
2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did  PPI Successes PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both. 2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.
2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement
PPI Claims ongoing with:
Cap one Now with the FOS
Barclays. They have now been given a deadline before FOS action. No response so complaints now with ICO and FOS.
LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc 1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this.. Post 290 from ***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON*** Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond. Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI. |
| |
24th June 2009, 22:07
|
#15 (permalink)
| | Basic Account Holder | Re: gary68 v TSB PPI sorry for not replying earlier PF,
many thanks for your much appreciated work once again,
Ive just been going through your figures and the £29, has now made me even more mad, I thought it was a rebate but as you pointed out it was a overpayment , what a rip off, but no surprise really.
looking at your figures it would be well worth claiming the contractual but I dont know if they will be more inclined to pay out on the statuary interest -if any- as there is nearly a 2 grand difference,
whats your veiws on this guys and do you think I would have any success at all with the Lloyds as this loan was finished in 2003 I wonder if they would consider it to late to claim,
Im going for the claim anyway just wanted to know which you would think would be a more clear cut claim, |
| |
24th June 2009, 22:33
|
#17 (permalink)
| | Classic Account Holder | Re: gary68 v TSB PPI Quote:
Originally Posted by GARY68 sorry for not replying earlier PF,
many thanks for your much appreciated work once again,
Ive just been going through your figures and the £29, has now made me even more mad, I thought it was a rebate but as you pointed out it was a overpayment , what a rip off, but no surprise really.
looking at your figures it would be well worth claiming the contractual but I dont know if they will be more inclined to pay out on the statuary interest -if any- as there is nearly a 2 grand difference,
whats your veiws on this guys and do you think I would have any success at all with the Lloyds as this loan was finished in 2003 I wonder if they would consider it to late to claim,
Im going for the claim anyway just wanted to know which you would think would be a more clear cut claim, | Hi Gary
We are currently in the process of claiming back PPI on 6 loans from LTSB (some current and some settled, the oldest having been settled in 2002) and I have to say LTSB are absolutely awful to deal with.
I assumed that with all of the loans they would put a fight rather than just pay up, but they are proving very difficult indeed.
On our oldest loans, they have returned the paperwork we sent them stating that the account numbers are not recognised, even though we sent them proof that these accounts did exist. We have the original CCAs so I think they are just trying to pull a fast one in implying that these loans are so old and that because they no longer have the original agreements, they don't have an obligation to refund us - which is a load of hogwash.
On the slightly more recent loans, they have not even had the courtesy to acknowledge the letters we have sent!
The current loans are still being investigated by them - so at least they are doing something.
I'm not trying to put you off at all, but do be prepared for an uphill struggle - it's certainly worth it though, particularly as you'll get plenty of support and assistance from everyone here!
We have asked initially for contractual interest, btw, because you can always accept less that way.
Good luck,
Landy x
__________________ LTSB Current Account Charges - Prelim sent Feb 2009 LTSB PPI on various loans (current/settled) - With FOS MBNA 1 Charges - Refunded inc CI MBNA 1 PPI - Refunded MBNA 2 Charges - Yet to start MBNA 2 PPI - Yet to start Swift Advances (settled) Mortgage Charges - Prelim sent May 2009 Swift Advances (settled) Mortgage PPI - With FOS Sainsburys (settled) Loan PPI - Refunded inc CI +8% Sainsburys (closed) Card Charges - Refunded inc CI + 8% M&S Money (closed) Card Charges - Prelim sent June 2009 M&S Money (closed) Card PPI - Refunded inc 8% Direct Line (settled) Loan PPI - With FOS Debenhams Card (closed) PPI - Refunded inc 8% C&G (settled) Mortgage Charges - Refunded inc CI + 8% S.Widows (settled) Mortgage cover - Prelim sent Jan 2010 Hitachi Finance (closed) Charges - Yet to start |
| |
24th June 2009, 23:00
|
#18 (permalink)
| | Gold Account Holder I am in: The Sunny South.
Posts: 4,336
| Re: gary68 v TSB PPI Gary,
You go for the contractual interest rate at 13.92% as this is what you have paid on each payment.
Then quiet rightly add on the 8% statutory judicial rate as they have Loaned that money from you.
The 13.92% goes on for each payment where as the 8% is applied from 13/03/2001 until time of payment.
If you would like me to work out exactly what you are due let me know and ill work it out.
Because it is getting late now and i need my bed I cannot do this though until tomorrow evening.
Regards
PF |
| |
24th June 2009, 23:02
|
#19 (permalink)
| | Basic Account Holder | Re: gary68 v TSB PPI Hi Landy
ive been looking at your threads recently,and I know that Lloyds wont be bending over for this claim and I may have to go fos or court route, I think I will be claiming for the contractual interest , like you say I could except a lower offer later-if any-,
Im going to amend and post off and see what happens and I think I will include this quote:
Firstly, I understand that at the time I entered into the contract with you your bank was running an incentive scheme to encourage your employees to sell PPI schemes, as were several other High Street banks. A former employee of yours has posted the following on a public website in September 2006: I worked for Lloyds TSB up to 4 1/2 years ago - the points system you state is being used by RBS was used by Lloyds TSB more than 5 years ago. Bosses and Regional Managers turn a blind eye to 'mis-selling' because they get bigger cash bonuses (or foreign holidays) than the staff selling the products. Even worse, Lloyds TSB use the disciplinary procedure to threaten staff with dismissal for failing to reach targets. I was personally threatened in this way and in the end left, after 25 years service, to find much more fulfilling employment elsewhere. Failing to hit targets was a bigger crime than mis-selling, which in my experience was brushed under the carpet. I was not aware of this and even if it is untrue, I consider that there was a clear conflict of interest between your fiduciary responsibilities to me and the direct selling by your employees of PPI schemes, given the very large profit margins they generate. |
| |
24th June 2009, 23:03
|
#20 (permalink)
| | Basic Account Holder | Re: gary68 v TSB PPI Quote:
Originally Posted by pompeyfaith Gary,
You go for the contractual interest rate at 13.92% as this is what you have paid on each payment.
Then quiet rightly add on the 8% statutory judicial rate as they have Loaned that money from you.
The 13.92% goes on for each payment where as the 8% is applied from 13/03/2001 until time of payment.
If you would like me to work out exactly what you are due let me know and ill work it out.
Because it is getting late now and i need my bed I cannot do this though until tomorrow evening.
Regards
PF | thanks PF
I can work from your spread sheet on that I think |
| |
Reclaim the Right Ltd. - reg.05783665 in the UK reg. office:- 923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE
|