;
;
| | | CAG Announcements | |
Welcome Guest
Please register
Registration is free
There are no charges for using any of the facilities of this website.
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ.
You will have to register before you can post.
To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
You will also have to register to access our template letters and claims forms
registration is free
Are you being threatened over debts more than 6 years old? This may be unfair
See our new Unfair Trading Guide eBay buyer? Buy more cheaply
Win more often
ConsumerSniper.com Have you been defaulted?
Would you like to clean up your credit file? Check it out | Ebay buyer? ConsumerSniper Free unlimited bids and eBay tools Have you been defaulted?
Would you like to clean up your credit file? Check it out | | | | | | |
23rd January 2010, 23:07
|
#1 (permalink)
|
Where else can you earn 8% interest on your money? Start your County Court claim NOW!!! Cagger since
: Jan 2007
Posts: 274
| BMWMAN -v- Barclaycard Hi All
I have read some very interesting threads on here regard Barclaycard and CCA requests.
I sent a CCA request to B/C on the 22/10/2009 and received a standard reply. As below CCA.doc
I see from the manchester hearing that the CCA must contain the debtors name and address therefore can this be applied retrospectively thus ruling this CCA as non-complient. |
| |
23rd January 2010, 23:17
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Site Team | Re: BMWMAN -v- Barclaycard HI BMW,
The letter says your agreement will be sent under separate cover although they don't always do this.
Give them a week or so to provide it. If they don't, then write giving them a deadline to comply of 10 days, or you'll complain to the fos .  |
| |
23rd January 2010, 23:53
|
#3 (permalink)
| | | Re: BMWMAN -v- Barclaycard Hi Slick132
Thank you for your reply.
Looking at the CCA it would appear not to comply with S78 in that the debtors name and address is missing. The Manchester ruling states that the CCA must contain the debtors name and address as at the time the agreement was executed. Manchester Summery.doc |
| |
24th January 2010, 00:44
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Site Team | Re: BMWMAN -v- Barclaycard Hi BMW,
Sorry, I now see the BC letter was sent last year and the "agreement" which they promised turned out to be their T&C's.
So they've not sent you an agreement, they have merely tried to fulfil their obligations imposed by s.78 CCA1974.
You could complain to BC that they haven't sent you a copy of the credit agreement, and you now require this or will complain to the fos .
Are you still paying on this a/c?
Last edited by slick132; 13th May 2010 at 22:42.
Reason: typo
|
| |
12th May 2010, 13:46
|
#6 (permalink)
| | | Re: BMWMAN -v- Barclaycard Hi All
I have now received a copy of my agreement. Firstly it does not contain my surname just my first names. Agreement.jpg
Last edited by bmwman; 12th May 2010 at 14:02.
|
| |
13th May 2010, 12:49
|
#9 (permalink)
| |
Posts: 274
| Re: BMWMAN -v- Barclaycard Hi All
Hope this is better.  |
| |
13th May 2010, 22:43
|
#10 (permalink)
| | Site Team | Re: BMWMAN -v- Barclaycard Hi BMW,
The document is missing Prescribed Terms required by the CCA 1974, eg the APR, Credit Limit or details of how this is to be decided, method of repayment. The missing surname is also a critical omission.
So it would appear not to be enforceable by a court.
Have there been any penalty charges on the a/c in the last 6 years and do you have all the statements for this period.  |
| |
13th May 2010, 23:26
|
#11 (permalink)
| | | Re: BMWMAN -v- Barclaycard Hi Slick132
Thank you for the reply
Yes charges have been applied to this account and claimed back just over £1000.00 is BC applied thier interest rates to these charges and then applied the repayment to the account thus clearing any debt leaving me with juts over £300.00 to come back. However their have been 4 or 5 DNs issued by Mercers so its not over. Have sent BC a SARs letter requesting copies of DNs specifically issued by BC or copies of written or as a sworn statement of truth any verbal authorization to any third party company. I received a reply to that yesterday and all that arrived was copies of DNs issued by Mercers on BC headed paper. So sent them another letter today. Dear Mrs Harrington, Thank you for your reply to my Subject access request dated 9th April 2010 (copy enclosed). PLEASE NOTE this has NOT been answered. I asked for copies of Default Notices specifically issued by Barclaycard (NOT THIRD PARTY COMPANIES) or copies of written or as a sworn statement of truth any verbal authorization to any third party company to issue Default Notices your reply contains neither. You therefore have until the 21st May 2010 to comply with the request or please answer Yes or No to the following questions within the meaning for the Perjury Act 1911 Section 5 and the Fraud Act 2006 Sections 1 to 5 1) That Barclaycard have issued Default Notices against me? Y/N [ ] 2) That Barclaycard have authorized a third party company to issue default notices against me? Y/N [ ] PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT FAILURE TO PRODUCE THE REQUESTED INFORMATON WILL RESULT IN THE ADVERSE MEANING NO DEFAULT NOTICE HAS BEEN ISSUED AND NO PERMISSON HAS BEEN GIVEN IN WRITING OR VERBALLY. This remains part of my first Subject access request and is covered under my first payment of £10.00. I know Mercers are BC inhouse collection agancy and that Mercers are filing dormant accounts at Companies House, Caulder Fincial Services is mearly a trading name for Mercers and both operate on he same credit license. The Consumer Credit Act states that DNs can be issued by the creditor or hirer therefore DNs issued by Mercers are fraudulent. Fraud Act 2006 c35 2 Fraud by false representation (1) A person is in breach of this section if he— (a) dishonestly makes a false representation, and (b) intends, by making the representation— (i) to make a gain for himself or another, or (ii) to cause loss to another or to expose another to a risk of loss. (2) A representation is false if— (a) it is untrue or misleading, and (b) the person making it knows that it is, or might be, untrue or misleading. (3) “Representation” means any representation as to fact or law, including a representation as to the state of mind of— (a) the person making the representation, or (b) any other person. (4) A representation may be express or implied. (5) For the purposes of this section a representation may be regarded as made if it (or anything implying it) is submitted in any form to any system or device designed to receive, convey or respond to communications (with or without human intervention). |
| |
14th May 2010, 07:42
|
#14 (permalink)
|
Watch out, there are Claims Touts about! Cagger since
: Jan 2007
Posts: 274
| Re: BMWMAN -v- Barclaycard Hi Slick132
Exactly my point this is why I have asked BC to provide DNs that do not exsist. As Mercers issued the DNs I need BC to prove that Mercer had permission from BC to issue them.
Secondly NO I did not recieve the second page with terms and conditions with this request. |
| |
Reclaim the Right Ltd. - reg.05783665 in the UK reg. office:- 923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE
vBulletin autolinks by AutoLinker.com Linux consultancy and web development
|